BLATANT CHEATING: “That’s Absolutely Never a Penalty” – Outrage Grows After Shocking Decision Turns the Game in Chelsea’s Favor

Fresh controversy is gripping the Premier League tonight after newly surfaced footage of Chelsea’s second penalty against Wolves began circulating online — and fans are absolutely losing it.
What looked like a routine VAR-checked decision in real time has now exploded into a full-blown debate after alternative camera angles suggest the foul may have occurred outside the penalty area, meaning Chelsea should have been awarded a free kick, not a spot-kick.
And once you see the clip? You’ll understand why Wolves fans are furious.
“HOW did VAR miss this?!”
The incident in question came midway through the first half at Molineux, with Chelsea already in control. Cole Palmer stepped up and calmly converted his second penalty of the match, stretching the lead and effectively sucking the life out of the home crowd.
At the time, protests from Wolves players were waved away. VAR checked the decision… and quickly upheld it.
Case closed. Or so we thought.
Within hours of full-time, new footage filmed from a low, pitch-side angle began spreading rapidly across X, Instagram, and TikTok. The clip appears to show the initial contact between attacker and defender happening just inches outside the box, before momentum carried both players into the area.

That distinction matters. A lot.
Because if the first contact is outside the box, the laws of the game are clear: it’s a free kick, not a penalty.
Freeze-frames, lines, and outrage 📸
Fans quickly got to work. Freeze-frames were posted. Lines were drawn. Zoomed-in screenshots flooded timelines. And the consensus among neutral supporters? This one looks… uncomfortable.
“Outside the box all day.”
“That’s never a penalty.”
“If this was against a top-six side, it’s overturned.”
Those were just some of the comments racking up thousands of likes within minutes.
Wolves supporters, meanwhile, feel robbed.
Many argue the penalty completely changed the tone of the match, turning a competitive contest into an uphill battle before halftime. Instead of potentially facing a dangerous free kick, Chelsea were gifted a golden opportunity — and they didn’t miss.
Silence from officials… for now 🤐
So far, there has been no official response from PGMOL or the Premier League regarding the new footage. But history tells us this isn’t going away quietly.
In recent seasons, similar incidents have led to post-match admissions of error, apologies to clubs, and renewed scrutiny of VAR’s consistency — especially when it comes to determining where contact begins versus where it ends.
And that’s the key issue here.
VAR is meant to deal in clear and obvious errors. But when angles are limited, and decisions hinge on centimeters, are referees really being given the best tools to make the right call?
Chelsea fans divided 👀
Interestingly, even among Chelsea supporters, opinions are split.
Some argue that the defender initiated contact and that the continuation into the box justifies the penalty. Others admit — quietly — that if the roles were reversed, they’d be furious.
One viral comment summed it up perfectly:
“If that’s given against us at Stamford Bridge, we’re talking about it for weeks.”
Bigger questions for the Premier League
This latest controversy reopens a familiar wound for English football: Is VAR actually improving fairness, or just changing the type of mistakes we argue about?
With ultra-slow motion, selective angles, and subjective interpretation, fans are left wondering how such a pivotal decision can still feel so wrong — even after review.
And for Wolves, it’s another painful chapter in a season where fine margins haven’t gone their way.
One thing is certain…
This footage isn’t disappearing. Broadcasters are replaying it. Pundits are dissecting it. And fans won’t stop sharing it.
Whether the Premier League responds or not, the damage is done.
Because once supporters start asking “Was that ever a penalty?” — the doubt lingers.
And for Wolves fans tonight, that doubt hurts almost as much as the scoreline.



