“WHAT WAS THAT CHANT!?”JIM GOODWIN HIT OUT AT CELTIC FANS THAT NEW UNVEILING CHANT MENTALLY BROKE MY PLAYER FROM ZERO – NINTY MINUTE

The atmosphere inside the stadium had already reached boiling point, but Jim Goodwin’s post-match reaction has added another layer to an already dramatic afternoon after Celtic fans unveiled a new chant that quickly became one of the major talking points of the game.

Goodwin was visibly frustrated when asked about the noise coming from the stands, particularly the chant that Celtic supporters introduced during the match. Rather than dismissing it as normal football banter, the manager claimed that the constant chanting had a serious psychological impact on his players and insisted that one of his players struggled to recover from it throughout the contest.

“What was that chant?” Goodwin was reported to have said in his furious reaction, before making it clear that he believed the atmosphere had gone beyond ordinary football pressure.

According to the manager, the chant was not simply something his players heard and ignored. He suggested that it became increasingly difficult for one of his players to block out as the match progressed, particularly as Celtic supporters continued to turn up the volume whenever his side attempted to build momentum.

Goodwin’s biggest concern appeared to be the psychological effect rather than the words of the chant themselves.

He believes his player went from feeling comfortable at the beginning of the match to looking increasingly uncomfortable as the intensity from the stands grew. The manager described the transformation as almost immediate, claiming the player went from “zero to ninety” during the ninety minutes.

For Celtic supporters, however, the chant was seen very differently. The home fans embraced the atmosphere, believing their vocal support could give the team another advantage and make life extremely uncomfortable for the opposition. Every successful challenge, missed opportunity and misplaced pass appeared to bring another wave of noise from the stands.

That atmosphere became particularly noticeable as the match developed.

Goodwin admitted that footballers are expected to deal with pressure, but he appeared unhappy with the way the situation affected his player. From his perspective, the responsibility of the manager is not only to prepare players tactically but also to protect their confidence when the environment becomes hostile.

The comments are now likely to generate plenty of discussion among supporters, with Celtic fans already debating whether Goodwin simply reacted emotionally after a difficult ninety minutes or whether the chant genuinely had the psychological impact he described.

Football managers regularly talk about the importance of supporters creating an intimidating atmosphere, and Celtic have traditionally been associated with a passionate home crowd. On this occasion, though, Goodwin believes that the atmosphere became a major factor in the way his team performed.

The manager also appeared to suggest that his players needed to be mentally stronger in situations like this. While he was critical of the Celtic supporters, his comments indirectly placed some responsibility on his own squad to handle the pressure better.

That could become an important lesson for the players going forward.

The most interesting part of Goodwin’s reaction was the suggestion that the effects lasted from the opening stages all the way through to the final whistle. Rather than being a brief moment of frustration, he believes the player was affected throughout the contest.

That claim has now transformed what could have simply been another post-match comment into a major talking point.

Celtic fans will undoubtedly see Goodwin’s words as evidence that their support made an impact. His opponents, meanwhile, may argue that experienced footballers should be able to handle chants from the stands without allowing them to influence their performance.

Either way, the manager clearly felt that something unusual happened inside the stadium.

The newly unveiled chant has now taken on a life of its own, with supporters likely to sing it even louder if they believe it unsettled the opposition. What began as a new piece of fan culture has suddenly become part of the wider story surrounding the match.

And after ninety minutes of pressure, noise and controversy, Goodwin’s message was unmistakable: he did not believe the chant was harmless background noise.

For him, it became a psychological battle — one he believes his player struggled to win.

Now, the question is whether Celtic fans will respond by doubling down on the chant or whether Goodwin’s criticism will make the entire situation even more intense the next time the two sides meet.

One thing is certain: after his explosive post-match comments, the chant is unlikely to disappear anytime soon.